Skip to content
FlarientFlarient
0.0 · G0 Quiet -1 nT CWhat do these mean?
All fact checks
UAP & Aliens

NASA Does Not Deliberately Cut ISS Live Feeds to Hide UFO Sightings

25 August 2026By FlarientCommunity submitted
NASA Does Not Deliberately Cut ISS Live Feeds to Hide UFO Sightings

Claim being checked

"NASA deliberately cuts the live International Space Station video feed whenever an unidentified flying object appears"

Claims that NASA intentionally terminates the International Space Station (ISS) live video feed to conceal unidentified flying objects are unfounded. Investigations confirm that transmission lapses are a natural consequence of orbital mechanics, not a deliberate effort to suppress information.

What the Claim Says

The claim alleges that NASA operators routinely and deliberately cut the live video feed from the International Space Station whenever an unidentified flying object (UFO) appears within the camera's field of view, suggesting an organised attempt to hide extraterrestrial evidence.

False100/100

Flarient Fact Checker Rating

This claim is entirely inaccurate or unsupported by facts.

The Verdict

False. There is no credible evidence to suggest that NASA actively suppresses footage of UAPs. Interruptions to the stream are routine and caused by the technical limitations of satellite data relay networks, not by human intervention aimed at censorship.

Decomposition

  • NASA suppresses data to hide UFOs.
  • Signal cut-outs are selective and coincide with mysterious sightings.
  • The agency engages in intentional concealment of UAP-related footage.

Evidence Analysis

The 'Double-Confirm' rule requires evidence from primary government sources. AARO reports, ODNI assessments, and the 2023 NASA UAP Independent Study Team report contain no documentation of deliberate feed suppression. Technical data confirms that signal loss occurs precisely when the ISS exits the coverage arc of the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRS) system.

Rationale

Signal interruptions are a predictable byproduct of orbital mechanics, affecting all data streams regardless of the content being transmitted. The accusation of intentional concealment lacks any technical or archival substantiation, failing to account for the documented infrastructure requirements of space-to-ground communication.

What Official Sources Say

  • The 2023 NASA UAP Independent Study Team report advocates for increased transparency and enhanced data-collection methods, which contradicts the premise of a suppression programme.
  • The AARO Historical Record Report confirms that investigations into UAPs rely on comprehensive data analysis, not the systematic withholding of feed footage.
  • DoD and ODNI assessments treat UAP sightings as matters of national security and scientific interest, focusing on data gathering rather than the selective editing of public broadcasts.

Context

UAPs, or Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, have become a focal point for both government research and public interest. The shift toward formalised reporting protocols, such as those overseen by AARO, ensures that unexplained sightings are processed through established scientific frameworks rather than speculative media narratives.

Bottom Line

Viewers observing 'cuts' to the ISS feed are seeing the reality of orbital telecommunications, not an alien cover-up. Rely on official reports from NASA and the Pentagon when evaluating claims regarding UAP transparency and government space operations.

Sources

ISS Live Now - NASA ISS Live Stream & Real-Time Tracking (https://isslivenow.com/)Why NASA's video feed cut away from that 'UFO' (https://www.cnet.com/science/why-nasas-video-feed-cut-away-from-that-ufo/)Space Station Camera Captures UFO? | Snopes.com (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ufomitted/)NASA UAP Independent Study Team Report (2023) — https://science.nasa.gov/uapODNI Annual Report on UAP (2022) — https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2022AARO Historical Record Report Vol. 1 (2024) — https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol1_2024.pdf

About this fact check: This verdict was generated by the Flarient Fact Checker using live space weather data from NOAA, NASA, and JPL, cross-referenced with AI analysis. It is not an official NOAA or government forecast. Always consult official space weather agencies for critical decisions.

Share this fact check

Seen another space weather claim that seems off?

Submit a claim